论文标题

使用经常性神经网络和KNN基于EEG信号的人类情绪分类

Human Emotion Classification based on EEG Signals Using Recurrent Neural Network And KNN

论文作者

Joshi, Shashank, Joshi, Falak

论文摘要

在人类的接触中,情绪非常重要。诸如单词,语音语调,面部表情和运动学之类的属性都可以用来描绘自己的感受。但是,脑部计算机界面(BCI)设备尚未达到情绪解释所需的水平。随着机器学习算法的快速开发,干电极技术以及脑机构界面的不同现实应用程序在普通人中的不同应用,脑电图数据的情绪分类最近引起了很多关注。脑电图(EEG)信号是这些系统的关键资源。采用脑电图信号的主要好处是它们反映了真实的情感,并且很容易通过计算机系统解决。在这项工作中,使用通道选择预处理鉴定了与良好,中性和负面情绪相关的EEG信号。但是,研究人员对到现在为止各种情绪状态之间联系的细节有限。为了识别脑电图信号,我们使用了离散的小波变换和机器学习技术,例如复发性神经网络(RNN)和K-Nearest邻居(KNN)算法。最初,分类器方法用于渠道选择。结果,通过整合来自这些通道的脑电图段的特征来创建最终功能向量。使用RNN和KNN算法,独立地对具有正面,中性和负面情绪连接的最终特征向量进行了分类。计算和比较两种技术的分类性能。使用RNN和KNN,平均整体精度分别为94.844%和93.438%。

In human contact, emotion is very crucial. Attributes like words, voice intonation, facial expressions, and kinesics can all be used to portray one's feelings. However, brain-computer interface (BCI) devices have not yet reached the level required for emotion interpretation. With the rapid development of machine learning algorithms, dry electrode techniques, and different real-world applications of the brain-computer interface for normal individuals, emotion categorization from EEG data has recently gotten a lot of attention. Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals are a critical resource for these systems. The primary benefit of employing EEG signals is that they reflect true emotion and are easily resolved by computer systems. In this work, EEG signals associated with good, neutral, and negative emotions were identified using channel selection preprocessing. However, researchers had a limited grasp of the specifics of the link between various emotional states until now. To identify EEG signals, we used discrete wavelet transform and machine learning techniques such as recurrent neural network (RNN) and k-nearest neighbor (kNN) algorithm. Initially, the classifier methods were utilized for channel selection. As a result, final feature vectors were created by integrating the features of EEG segments from these channels. Using the RNN and kNN algorithms, the final feature vectors with connected positive, neutral, and negative emotions were categorized independently. The classification performance of both techniques is computed and compared. Using RNN and kNN, the average overall accuracies were 94.844 % and 93.438 %, respectively.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源