论文标题

为什么我们仍在使用3D质量进行集群宇宙学?

Why are we still using 3D masses for cluster cosmology?

论文作者

Debackere, Stijn N. B., Hoekstra, Henk, Schaye, Joop, Heitmann, Katrin, Habib, Salman

论文摘要

星系簇的丰度对物质分布的后期演变高度敏感,因为在最高密度峰处形成簇。但是,如果不进行观测值,由于假设和真实的群集密度谱之间的不匹配以及沿着视线的被忽视物质引起的不匹配而导致模型依赖性偏差和不确定性,就无法推断出3D簇质量。由于可以直接在模拟中测量预测的孔径质量,并通过弱透镜观察,因此我们认为它们更适合聚类宇宙学。使用仅重力模拟的mira-titan套件,我们表明孔径质量与3D光晕质量密切相关,尽管由于沿着视线沿线的物质分布变化,因此具有较大的固有散射。但是,从观察值中,可以将孔径质量$ \ $ \ $ \ $ \ $ \倍数高约2-3倍,因为它们不需要关于密度剖面的假设,并且仅受弱透镜测量中的形状噪声的影响。我们通过高斯过程直接模仿光圈质量函数的宇宙学依赖性。 Comparing the cosmology sensitivity of the aperture mass function and the 3D halo mass function for a fixed survey solid angle and redshift interval, we find the aperture mass sensitivity is higher for $Ω_\mathrm{m}$ and $w_a$, similar for $σ_8$, $n_\mathrm{s}$, and $w_0$, and slightly lower for $h$.使用经过精心校准的光圈质量函数模拟器,群集宇宙学分析可以直接使用簇光圈质量,从而降低了对模型依赖性质量校准偏见和不确定性的敏感性。

The abundance of clusters of galaxies is highly sensitive to the late-time evolution of the matter distribution, since clusters form at the highest density peaks. However, the 3D cluster mass cannot be inferred without deprojecting the observations, introducing model-dependent biases and uncertainties due to the mismatch between the assumed and the true cluster density profile and the neglected matter along the sightline. Since projected aperture masses can be measured directly in simulations and observationally through weak lensing, we argue that they are better suited for cluster cosmology. Using the Mira-Titan suite of gravity-only simulations, we show that aperture masses correlate strongly with 3D halo masses, albeit with large intrinsic scatter due to the varying matter distribution along the sightline. Nonetheless, aperture masses can be measured $\approx 2-3$ times more precisely from observations, since they do not require assumptions about the density profile and are only affected by the shape noise in the weak lensing measurements. We emulate the cosmology dependence of the aperture mass function directly with a Gaussian process. Comparing the cosmology sensitivity of the aperture mass function and the 3D halo mass function for a fixed survey solid angle and redshift interval, we find the aperture mass sensitivity is higher for $Ω_\mathrm{m}$ and $w_a$, similar for $σ_8$, $n_\mathrm{s}$, and $w_0$, and slightly lower for $h$. With a carefully calibrated aperture mass function emulator, cluster cosmology analyses can use cluster aperture masses directly, reducing the sensitivity to model-dependent mass calibration biases and uncertainties.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源