论文标题

在YouTube上表征替代货币化策略

Characterizing Alternative Monetization Strategies on YouTube

论文作者

Hua, Yiqing, Ribeiro, Manoel Horta, West, Robert, Ristenpart, Thomas, Naaman, Mor

论文摘要

YouTube平台的主要新兴角色之一是为创建者提供了从其内容和交互中产生收入的能力。除了平台直接提供的工具(例如广告收入分享)之外,创建者还选择了使用各种平台货币化机会的平台。在这项工作中,我们专注于研究和表征这些替代货币化策略。利用大量的YouTube数据集的流行创作者的数据集,我们开发了替代货币化策略的分类法和一种简单的方法来自动检测其使用情况。然后,我们继续表征采用这些策略。首先,我们发现外部货币化的使用是广泛的且越来越普遍的,在所有视频中的18%中都使用,其中61%的渠道至少使用一次这样的策略。其次,我们表明,这些策略的采用在不同种类和受欢迎程度的渠道之间有很大变化,并且建立这些替代收入流的渠道通常在平台上变得更有生产力。最后,我们研究了潜在的问题渠道(生产Alt-Lite,Alt-Right和Manosphere含量的渠道)如何利用替代的货币化策略,发现它们采用了比精心选择的比较渠道相比,他们采用更多样化的此类策略。这一发现使YouTube作为守门人的角色变得复杂,因为从其本地平台上货币化中排除政策竞争性内容的做法可能无效。总体而言,这项工作为扩大对YouTube内容创建背后的货币激励措施的理解提供了重要的一步。

One of the key emerging roles of the YouTube platform is providing creators the ability to generate revenue from their content and interactions. Alongside tools provided directly by the platform, such as revenue-sharing from advertising, creators co-opt the platform to use a variety of off-platform monetization opportunities. In this work, we focus on studying and characterizing these alternative monetization strategies. Leveraging a large longitudinal YouTube dataset of popular creators, we develop a taxonomy of alternative monetization strategies and a simple methodology to detect their usage automatically. We then proceed to characterize the adoption of these strategies. First, we find that the use of external monetization is expansive and increasingly prevalent, used in 18% of all videos, with 61% of channels using one such strategy at least once. Second, we show that the adoption of these strategies varies substantially among channels of different kinds and popularity, and that channels that establish these alternative revenue streams often become more productive on the platform. Lastly, we investigate how potentially problematic channels -- those that produce Alt-lite, Alt-right, and Manosphere content -- leverage alternative monetization strategies, finding that they employ a more diverse set of such strategies significantly more often than a carefully chosen comparison set of channels. This finding complicates YouTube's role as a gatekeeper, since the practice of excluding policy-violating content from its native on-platform monetization may not be effective. Overall, this work provides an important step toward broadening the understanding of the monetary incentives behind content creation on YouTube.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源