论文标题
通过选择过滤器银行选择改进移动前模式检测
Improving Pre-movement Pattern Detection with Filter Bank Selection
论文作者
论文摘要
前动力解码在运动检测中起重要作用,并且能够在肢体移动前用低频脑电图(EEG)信号检测运动开始。在相关研究中,已证明使用标准任务相关的组件分析(StrCA)进行移动解码是有效的,可以在运动状态和静止状态之间进行分类。但是,频域中子带之间的strca精度有所不同。由于个体的差异,最佳子带在受试者之间有所不同,很难确定。这项研究旨在通过在多个子带上选择特征,并避免选择最佳子带来提高strca方法的性能。这项研究首先比较了三个频率范围设置($ m_1 $:具有相同间距带宽的子带; $ m_2 $:高截止频率的子带,其高截止频率是低截止频率的两倍; $ m_3 $:以某些特定的固定频率和频率以算术序列启动的子带,以某种特定的固定频率开始。然后,我们开发了一种基于信息的技术来选择这些子带中的功能。二进制支持向量机分类器用于对所选基本功能进行分类。结果表明,$ m_3 $比其他两个设置更好。凭借$ m_3 $的过滤库,拟议的FBTRCA的分类准确性可实现0.8700 $ \ pm $ 0.1022,这意味着与strca(0.8287 $ \ pm $ 0.1101)以及交叉验证和测试方法(0.8431 $ \ pm $ 0.1078)相比,性能明显提高。
Pre-movement decoding plays an important role in movement detection and is able to detect movement onset with low-frequency electroencephalogram (EEG) signals before the limb moves. In related studies, pre-movement decoding with standard task-related component analysis (STRCA) has been demonstrated to be efficient for classification between movement state and resting state. However, the accuracies of STRCA differ among subbands in the frequency domain. Due to individual differences, the best subband differs among subjects and is difficult to be determined. This study aims to improve the performance of the STRCA method by a feature selection on multiple subbands and avoid the selection of best subbands. This study first compares three frequency range settings ($M_1$: subbands with equally spaced bandwidths; $M_2$: subbands whose high cut-off frequencies are twice the low cut-off frequencies; $M_3$: subbands that start at some specific fixed frequencies and end at the frequencies in an arithmetic sequence.). Then, we develop a mutual information based technique to select the features in these subbands. A binary support vector machine classifier is used to classify the selected essential features. The results show that $M_3$ is a better setting than the other two settings. With the filter banks in $M_3$, the classification accuracy of the proposed FBTRCA achieves 0.8700$\pm$0.1022, which means a significantly improved performance compared to STRCA (0.8287$\pm$0.1101) as well as to the cross validation and testing method (0.8431$\pm$0.1078).