论文标题
PRAD-II:质子电荷半径的新升级高精度测量
PRad-II: A New Upgraded High Precision Measurement of the Proton Charge Radius
论文作者
论文摘要
PRAD实验已可靠地证明了E-P散射实验中量热法的优势,以高精度测量质子根平方(RMS)电荷半径。在其实验性不确定性中,PRAD结果与在Muonic氢光谱实验中测得的小半径一致,这是最近对Proton电荷半径的Codata建议的最新修订中的关键输入。因此,PRAD结果与所有现代电子散射实验直接冲突。最重要的是,它比迄今为止最精确的电子散射实验的值小5.8%,考虑到PRAD实验的精确度,该差异约为三个标准偏差。作为此类实验的第一个实验,PRAD未达到量热学技术允许的最高精度。在这里,我们提出了一个新的(和)升级的实验-PRAD-II,与PRAD相比,将总体实验不确定性减少3.8倍,并在亚原子物理学中尚未解决这一问题。此外,PRAD-II将是第一个Lepton散射实验,即达到10^{-5} GEV^2的Q^2范围,允许对质子电荷半径进行更准确,更强大的提取。 Muonic氢的前所未有的精度(〜0.05%)确定质子电荷半径的尾巴值,因此,评估这些实验可能的系统不确定性,例如在最近的评论文章中提出的激光频率校准,这一点至关重要。 PRAD-II的预计总不确定性为0.43%,可以证明$ E-P $散射和Muonic氢结果之间是否存在系统差异。 PRAD-II将在电子散射和开放式门中建立一个新的精确边界,以实现未来的物理机会。
The PRad experiment has credibly demonstrated the advantages of the calorimetric method in e-p scattering experiments to measure the proton root-mean-square (RMS) charge radius with high accuracy. The PRad result, within its experimental uncertainties, is in agreement with the small radius measured in muonic hydrogen spectroscopy experiments and it was a critical input in the recent revision of the CODATA recommendation for the proton charge radius. Consequently, the PRad result is in direct conflict with all modern electron scattering experiments. Most importantly, it is 5.8% smaller than the value from the most precise electron scattering experiment to date, and this difference is about three standard deviations given the precision of the PRad experiment. As the first experiment of its kind, PRad did not reach the highest precision allowed by the calorimetric technique. Here we propose a new (and) upgraded experiment -- PRad-II, which will reduce the overall experimental uncertainties by a factor of 3.8 compared to PRad and address this as yet unsettled controversy in subatomic physics. In addition, PRad-II will be the first lepton scattering experiment to reach the Q^2 range of 10^{-5} GeV^2 allowing a more accurate and robust extraction of the proton charge radius. The muonic hydrogen result with its unprecedented precision (~0.05%) determines the CODATA value of the proton charge radius, hence, it is critical to evaluate possible systematic uncertainties of those experiments, such as the laser frequency calibration that was raised in recent review articles. The PRad-II experiment with its projected total uncertainty of 0.43% could demonstrate whether there is any systematic difference between $e-p$ scattering and muonic hydrogen results. PRad-II will establish a new precision frontier in electron scattering and open doors for future physics opportunities.