论文标题
由蒙特利尔AI伦理研究所(MAIEI)编写的关于负责人AI的出版规范的报告
Report prepared by the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) on Publication Norms for Responsible AI
论文作者
论文摘要
科学技术的历史表明,科学理论和研究中看似无害的发展使现实世界中的应用对人类产生了重大的负面影响。为了确保AI的科学和技术以人道的方式发展,我们必须制定研究出版物规范,这些规范我们对AI潜在威胁和用例的了解不断提高。不幸的是,很难为负责人的AI创建一套出版规范,因为AI领域目前在研究,开发,资助,资助该技术方面分配了该技术的零散,以研究这一挑战并找到解决方案,蒙特利尔AI Ethics Institute(MAIEI)共同主持了两次公共咨询,并在5月2020年的AI中与AIN的合作伙伴建立了ai。以及出版商的前进方向。 Maiei在提交的提交中提供了六个初始建议,其中包括:1)创建用于浏览出版决策的工具,2)提供页码扩展名,3)建立同行网络,4)需要广泛的影响声明,5)需要预期的结果,而6)6)修改同行评估过程。在考虑了对这些建议的潜在问题,包括限制创新和为AI研究创建“黑市”之后,Maiei概述了出版商的三种方式,其中包括:1)清楚而始终如一地指出,对既定规范的需求,2)协调和建立信任作为一个社区,以及3)改变方法。
The history of science and technology shows that seemingly innocuous developments in scientific theories and research have enabled real-world applications with significant negative consequences for humanity. In order to ensure that the science and technology of AI is developed in a humane manner, we must develop research publication norms that are informed by our growing understanding of AI's potential threats and use cases. Unfortunately, it's difficult to create a set of publication norms for responsible AI because the field of AI is currently fragmented in terms of how this technology is researched, developed, funded, etc. To examine this challenge and find solutions, the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) co-hosted two public consultations with the Partnership on AI in May 2020. These meetups examined potential publication norms for responsible AI, with the goal of creating a clear set of recommendations and ways forward for publishers. In its submission, MAIEI provides six initial recommendations, these include: 1) create tools to navigate publication decisions, 2) offer a page number extension, 3) develop a network of peers, 4) require broad impact statements, 5) require the publication of expected results, and 6) revamp the peer-review process. After considering potential concerns regarding these recommendations, including constraining innovation and creating a "black market" for AI research, MAIEI outlines three ways forward for publishers, these include: 1) state clearly and consistently the need for established norms, 2) coordinate and build trust as a community, and 3) change the approach.