论文标题
在以物质为主时代寻找黑暗能源
Searching for dark energy in the matter-dominated era
论文作者
论文摘要
检测动态暗能量的特征的大多数努力都集中在后期,$ z \ Lessim 2 $,其中暗能量组件开始主导宇宙能量密度。但是,许多涉及动态暗能量的理论模型都表现出一个“冷冻”状态方程,其中$ w \ to the time the time $ w \ to -1 $,并且在早期的时间过渡到“跟踪”行为(在足够高的红移时具有$ w \ gg -1 $)。在本文中,我们研究了在静修后主导的政权中进行的大规模结构调查,$ 2 \ sillesim z \ Lessim 6 $ 6 $,对这种行为很敏感,以这种偶然的精确范围可检测到黑暗的能量成分(尽管是强烈的亚基)。使用受Horndeski(广义标量张)理论的参数空间研究启发的现象学模型,我们展示了现有的CMB和大规模结构测量方法如何限制以物质主导的时代的黑暗能量方程,并研究即将到来的Galaxy Surveys和21cm强度映射工具如何改善该制度中的约束。我们还发现,现有的CMB和LSS约束与DESI的组合已经接近使用BAO/Galaxy功率谱测量来提供$ H_0 $的最佳限制,并且是LSST Galaxy样品的光谱随访(例如,沿着$ spapeel of Spectel of Spectel of Spectel 2/pumaplace compusent of Z.G. \ gtrsim 2 $,将对此处考虑的黑暗能源模型提供更好的约束,而不是在$ z \ Lessim 1.5 $处进行可比的宇宙差异有限的银河系调查。
Most efforts to detect signatures of dynamical dark energy are focused on late times, $z \lesssim 2$, where the dark energy component begins to dominate the cosmic energy density. Many theoretical models involving dynamical dark energy exhibit a 'freezing' equation of state however, where $w \to -1$ at late times, with a transition to a 'tracking' behaviour at earlier times (with $w \gg -1$ at sufficiently high redshift). In this paper, we study whether large-scale structure surveys in the post-reionisation matter-dominated regime, $2 \lesssim z \lesssim 6$, are sensitive to this behaviour, on the basis that the dark energy component should remain detectable (despite being strongly subdominant) in this redshift range given sufficiently precise observations. Using phenomenological models inspired by parameter space studies of Horndeski (generalised scalar-tensor) theories, we show how existing CMB and large-scale structure measurements constrain the dark energy equation of state in the matter-dominated era, and examine how forthcoming galaxy surveys and 21cm intensity mapping instruments can improve constraints in this regime. We also find that the combination of existing CMB and LSS constraints with DESI will already come close to offering the best possible constraints on $H_0$ using BAO/galaxy power spectrum measurements, and that either a spectroscopic follow-up of the LSST galaxy sample (e.g. along the lines of MegaMapper or SpecTel) or a Stage 2/PUMA-like intensity mapping survey, both at $z \gtrsim 2$, would offer better constraints on the class of dark energy models considered here than a comparable cosmic variance-limited galaxy survey at $z \lesssim 1.5$.