论文标题

球形恒星形成云中的磁场结构。 ii。从观察到的地图估算场结构

Magnetic Field Structure in Spheroidal Star-Forming Clouds. II. Estimating Field Structure from Observed Maps

论文作者

Myers, Philip C., Stephens, Ian W., Auddy, Sayantan, Basu, Shantanu, Bourke, Tyler L., Hull, Charles L. H.

论文摘要

本文提出了模型,以估计球体凝结中密度和磁场强度的结构,从其柱密度的地图以及磁对齐的灰尘晶粒的极化。密度模型是通过将柱密度图与任何纵横比和倾斜度的嵌入式p = 2的plummer球体拟合而获得的。磁性特性基于密度模型,基于Alfvénic波动的Davis-Chandrasekhar-Fermi(DCF)模型,以及纸张中的质量和磁通量的球体通量冻结(SFF)模型。这些模型应用于Protostar BHR71 IRS1包膜的Alma观察结果。柱密度拟合从(2.0 +-0.4)x 10^5 cm^-3至(7 +-1)x 10^7 cm^-3。密度模型预测了磁场图映射,该图形最适合1100 au之内的极化图,其角度差为17°。在该区域中,DCF平均场强度为0.7 +-0.2 mg,包膜质量是超临界的,质量与磁临界质量为1.5 +-0.4。 SFF场强度轮廓尺度尺度为DCF场强,从60 x10μg到4+-1 mg。 SFF场强度估计的空间分辨率比DCF分辨率高〜7,而峰值SFF场强的强度超过了DCF场强度〜5。

This paper presents models to estimate the structure of density and magnetic field strength in spheroidal condensations, from maps of their column density and their polarization of magnetically aligned dust grains. The density model is obtained by fitting a column density map with an embedded p = 2 Plummer spheroid of any aspect ratio and inclination. The magnetic properties are based on the density model, on the Davis-Chandrasekhar-Fermi (DCF) model of Alfvénic fluctuations, and on the Spheroid Flux Freezing (SFF) model of mass and flux conservation in Paper I. The field strength model has the resolution of the column density map, which is finer than the resolution of the DCF estimate of field strength. The models are applied to ALMA observations of the envelope of the protostar BHR71 IRS1. Column density fits give the density model, from (2.0 +- 0.4) x 10^5 cm^-3 to (7 +- 1) x 10^7 cm^-3 . The density model predicts the field directions map, which fits the polarization map best within 1100 au, with standard deviation of angle differences 17°. In this region the DCF mean field strength is 0.7 +- 0.2 mG and the envelope mass is supercritical, with ratio of mass to magnetic critical mass 1.5 +- 0.4. The SFF field strength profile scales with the DCF field strength, from 60 x 10μG to 4+-1 mG. The spatial resolution of the SFF field strength estimate is finer than the DCF resolution by a factor ~7, and the peak SFF field strength exceeds the DCF field strength by a factor ~5.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源