学术文献库

We prove that superdeterministic models of quantum mechanics are conspiratorial in a mathematically well-defined sense, by further development of the ideas presented in a previous article $\mathcal{A}$. We consider a Bell scenario where, in each run and at each wing, the experimenter chooses one of $N$ devices to determine the local measurement setting. We prove, without assuming any features of quantum statistics, that superdeterministic models of this scenario must have a finely-tuned distribution of hidden variables. Specifically, fine-tuning is required so that the measurement statistics depend on the measurement settings but not on the details of how the settings are chosen. We quantify this as the overhead fine-tuning $F$ of the model, and show that $F > 0$ (corresponding to `fine-tuned') for any $N >1$. The notion of fine-tuning assumes that arbitrary (`nonequilibrium') hidden-variables distributions are possible in principle. We also show how to quantify superdeterministic conspiracy without using nonequilibrium. This second approach is based on the fact that superdeterministic correlations can mimic actual signalling. We argue that an analogous situation occurs in equilibrium where, for every run, the devices that the hidden variables are correlated with are coincidentally the same as the devices in fact used. This results in extremely large superdeterministic correlations, which we quantify as a drop of an appropriately defined formal entropy. Nonlocal and retrocausal models turn out to be non-conspiratorial according to both approaches.