论文标题
与正交时间频率空间信号传输的非正交多访问
Non Orthogonal Multiple Access with Orthogonal Time Frequency Space Signal Transmission
论文作者
论文摘要
最近,正在追求正交时间频率空间(OTF),作为适合在高移动性场景中使用的合适无线传输技术。在这项工作中,我们提出了基于非正交的多重ACESS(NOMA)OTF,可以称为Noma-OTFS系统,并从系统级别和链接级别的角度评估其性能。挑战在于一个事实,尽管OTFS传输技术以其对高迁移率条件的韧性而闻名,而与正交多重访问相比,NOMA在低移动性场景中产生了高光谱效率(OMA)。我们提出了最小平方误差(MMSE) - 基于NOMA-OTF的基于连续的干扰取消(SIC)接收器,为此我们得出了符号后处理的SINR的表达,以评估系统总和光谱效率(SE)。我们开发了功率分配方案,以最大程度地提高NOMA高速公路版本中的总和。我们进一步使用LDPC代码以及MMSE均等化,进一步设计了可实现的CodeWord级别SIC(CWIC)接收器,以评估这种实用的NOMA-OTFS系统的链路级别性能。将提出的NOMA-OTFS系统的系统级别和链路级别的性能与基准OMA-OTF,OMA - 正交频施加多路复用(OMA-OFDM)和NOMA-OFDM方案进行了比较。从系统级的性能评估中,我们有趣地观察到Noma-OTF提供的总和比OMA-OTF更高。与Noma-OfdM相比,我们发现Noma-OTF的中断以平均SE的减少成本改善。而链接级的结果表明,在块错误率(BLER),GOODPUT和吞吐量方面,开发的基于CWIC的NOMA-OTFS接收器的性能明显优于Noma-OfdM。
Orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) is being pursued in recent times as a suitable wireless transmission technology for use in high mobility scenarios. In this work, we propose nonorthogonal multiple acess (NOMA) based OTFS which may be called NOMA-OTFS system and evaluate its performance from system level and link level perspective. The challenge lies in the fact that while OTFS transmission technology is known for its resilience to high mobility conditions, while NOMA is known to yield high spectral efficiency in low mobility scenarios in comparison to orthogonal multiple access (OMA). We present a minimum mean square error (MMSE)- successive interference cancellation (SIC) based receiver for NOMA-OTFS, for which we derive expression for symbol-wise post-processing SINR in order to evaluate system sum spectral efficiency (SE). We develop power allocation schemes to maximize the sum SE in the high-mobility version of NOMA. We further design a realizable codeword level SIC (CWIC) receiver using LDPC codes along with MMSE equalization for evaluating link level performance of such practical NOMA-OTFS system. The system level and link level performance of the proposed NOMA-OTFS system are compared against benchmark OMA-OTFS, OMA-orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OMA-OFDM) and NOMA-OFDM schemes. From system-level performance evaluation, we observe interestingly that NOMA-OTFS provides higher sum SE than OMA-OTFS. When compared to NOMA-OFDM, we find that outage SE of NOMA-OTFS is improved at the cost of decrease in mean SE. Whereas link-level results show that the developed CWIC based NOMA-OTFS receiver performs significantly better than NOMA-OFDM in terms of block error rate (BLER), goodput and throughput.